A little bit of trader transparency

While plenty of trading gurus and twitter traders like to talk about how transparent they are, most say little about themselves or their trades. Many go by aliases, many post their trades only after they have supposedly made them, or put their trades up on their website, pretending that by posting a trade on their own website with no third-party verification it somehow proves they made the trade. Screw them all! I have nothing to hide so I am posting below details from my past tax returns. Furthermore, I have directly imported all my past trades (where that was possible) to Profit.ly. I went back and hand-entered trades from accounts I could no longer auto-import from. See my trades on Profit.ly here. This listing of my trades is not guaranteed to be correct — I am sure that there are small mistakes in trades I hand-entered and auto-importing of trades appears to have missed a few trades. That being said, my record on Profit.ly is an honest accounting of my trades and is very close to the gains that I have reported to the IRS.

Besides the trades that I have posted on Profit.ly, I thought I could provide a bit more information on my trading gains. From 2007 until January 1, 2011, my trades on Profit.ly show $497,167 in profit. For the tax years 2007 to 2010 I reported to the IRS $510,553 in gross trading profit (this excludes long-term capital gains and expenses other than commissions). See below for details.

2007
I do not have electronic copies of my tax returns from this year.
Long-term capital gains: $12,386
Dividends: $4,857
Gross trading profits (short term capital gains on Schedule D): $58,697

I did not have enough trading activity to file as a business trader in 2007 so most of my (modest) trading expenses were not deductible.

The vast majority of my trading in 2007 was in my individual Interactive Brokers account, since closed. See the 59-page PDF activity statement showing all my 2007 activity.

2008

Schedule D long-term gains: $5,030
Schedule D short-term gains: $203,726
Add back trading gains transferred to Schedule C: $31,451
Add back loss on private company LLC investment: $18,633
Gross trading profits: $253,810
Trading expenses: $31,451
Net trading profits: $222,359

Starting in 2008 I began filing as a business trader, which allowed me to deduct trading-related expenses. Because of the special tax treatment that business traders receive (deductible expenses but no self-employment tax) my accounting firm transfers as much income from Schedule D to Schedule C as is necessary to zero out the trading expenses.

Almost half of my trading expenses, $14,189, were due to interest (almost all of which was a loan from a family member for funds I used for trading). Getting a sit-to-stand desk and four touchscreen computer monitors accounted for another good chunk of expenses and I paid Tim Sykes a bunch of money in 2008 too.

The vast majority of my trading activity up until May took place in my individual IB account, since closed. See all my 2008 activity in this account. I opened a new account (that I currently use) at IB that was my primary trading account for the rest of the year.

Goldman Sachs trade report
Image cut from tax return Schedule D
Image cut from tax return Schedule D continuation sheet
Image cut from tax return Schedule C

2009

Schedule D short-term gains: $84,992
Add back trading gains transferred to Schedule C: $15,178
Add back short-term losses on Prosper.com loans: $201
Gross trading profits: $100,371
Trading expenses: $15,178
Net trading profit: $85,193

Again, approximately half my trading expenses were due to interest, most of which was from a loan from a family member to fund my trading accounts.

Image cut from tax return Schedule D
Image cut from tax return Schedule D continuation sheet
Image cut from Schedule C
Goldman Sachs trade report

2010
In 2010 I elected to become a mark-to-market trader; consequently my trading gains are now filed on Form 4797, not Schedule D.
Form 4797 gross trading gains: $87,871
Subtract gain on Section 197 expensed trading DVD: $156
Add back trading gains transferred to Schedule C: $3,680
Add Broadstreet trading gains: $6,280
Gross trading profits: $97,675
Trading expenses: $9,960
Net trading profit: $87,715

Image cut from 4797
Image cut from detailed statement of gains
Image cut from Schedule C for trading business
Image of other (prop firm) trading income

Lightspeed trade activity (Account opened and closed in 2010)
Broadstreet trade report (Account opened and closed in 2010)

2011
I have not received 1099 forms yet. Preliminary data downloaded from my brokers and analyzed by Tradelog is provided below but it has not been verified / double checked.

Interactive Brokers: $67,823 gross profit (net of $10,094 in commissions; $2,901,330 in sales and $2,833,507 in purchases)
SpeedTrader:  $86,212 gross profit (net of $13,153 in commissions; $4,120,830 in sales and $4,037,953 in purchases)
Capstone: $196 gross profit (net of $142 in commissions; $12,797 in sales and $12,601 in purchases)
Gross profit $154,231

I will update this post after I have received my 1099 forms.

Disclosure: I remain a satisfied client of Interactive Brokers and Capstone. I am no longer a client of any other broker or proprietary trading firm mentioned. I have an ongoing business relationship with Tim Sykes that is explained in my terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

I no longer recommend InvestorsUnderground.com stock chat

My InvestorsUnderground affiliate link redirects to this page. I stopped using InvestorsUnderground stock chat in December 2010 and I stopped recommending the chat at the same time. I do not recommend products or services that I do not use. This should not be considered a recommendation against IU chat — I simply don’t know enough to have an opinion anymore.

My old affiliate link now redirects to this page.

[Post updated 7 November 2018]

Disclosure: I used to be an affiliate of InvestorsUnderground (IU) stock chat, for which I received 50% of a new subscriber’s first month’s payment and 25% on an ongoing basis. I have not received any affiliate payments from them since December 2010. I am no longer a member of InvestorsUnderground stock chat; my membership ended at the end of 2010. I had subscribed to IU since its inception at the beginning of 2009 and I paid the standard rate of membership for charter members, which was $99/quarter (I also was a member of the free predecessor chat, Green on the Screen, for 6 months starting in summer 2008). From 2009 through 2010, I received a total of $5,720.39 (net of Paypal fees) from Pietro Rossa Trading (the Nevada corporation through which Nate Michaud runs InvestorsUnderground). This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

No honor among stock pumpers

I was a bit surprised when I received the following in an email from third-rate stock promoter Megastockpicks (although the email came from epicstockpicks.com) :

Megastockpicks.com is NOW… EpicStockPicks.com!

Hello All,

We would like to announce that Megastockpicks.com is NOW…Epicstockpicks.com! Due to issues with the name and owner, we have decided to change the name.

**Please disregard any future emails from MegaStockPicks or Megastockpicks.com.  The site will no longer be updated and soon be taken down.  If you do happen to receive an email, know that we are no longer running this site.

“Okay, that is odd,” I thought to myself. Why would they do that? Shortly thereafter I received another email, this time coming from megastockpicks.com.

Hello, MEGA subscribers
I want to thank you all for being loyal fans of MEGA Stock Picks, I also want to add that our picks are going to become better!
We will be offering more penny stocks of ALL kinds, not just OTC stocks that have a 50/50 chance of rising.
Some GREAT MEGA picks are coming your way!
Over the next few weeks you will all see why we are one newsletter you want to keep on receiving.
The other site claiming to be the old MegaStockPicks.com will EPICALLY fail!
Please also make sure your spam filters are set to receive our emails.
Please DISREGARD any emails from epicstockpicks.com as they no part have anything to do with megastockpicks.com, we are still here and will continue to bring you picks with MEGA gains.

This made things even more confusing. Yet clarity (of a sort) was coming in another email from EpicStockPicks (the purported new MegasStockpicks website):

EpicStockPicks/MegaStockPicks Dispute
Hello All,

I want to clear the air here as you have received both emails from us and Megastockpicks.com and many are confused.  We apologize in advance for the multiple emails.

A silent partner of ours who had not been active in the site decided to lock out our team from the website.  Because of this, we had decided to start EpicStockPicks.com.  All of the previous picks from megastockpicks.com came from our team’s extensive research and DD.

While he may still claim the website and logo’s which is our intellectual property, he no longer has function of the site since he does not have the capabilities of running it.

Well that sure clarifies the whole situation! I have no clue which pumper is lying (or maybe they both are lying: maybe one stole the other’s email list or hacked their website; or maybe neither is lying, although I doubt it). It does not matter. It is nice to see scummy stock promoters attacking each other rather than just helping their subscribers lose money for a change. This is yet another reason why you should never trust stock promoters. Always assume a stock promoter is lying!

Disclosure: No positions in any stocks mentioned and no connection to either website. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

SEC sues alleged stock manipulators behind BlueFire Ethanol (BFRE) and other pump & dumps

BlueFire was one of the first pump and dumps I observed. Below is the chart. Guess where the pump and dump occurred.

bfre

Here is the summary from the SEC’s litigation release:

The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a complaint against Blake Williams of Dallas, Texas, and registered representative Derek Lopez, of Torrance, California, and numerous entities that they controlled, alleging that they committed securities fraud by manipulating the markets of numerous microcap stocks from 2006 to 2008. The Commission alleges that the defendants sold stock in unregistered offerings and that their subsequent manipulation led to artificially high prices and volume, which allowed the defendants and others to sell their holdings for substantial gains. The complaint also alleges that Williams acted as an unregistered broker-dealer when he solicited purchases of stock and traded on behalf of investors who bought stock from him.

The Commission’s complaint alleges that Williams, using five entities that he controlled, and Lopez, using the entity Da Big Kahuna, LLC, engaged in a number of manipulative practices, including:

  • engaging in “bid support” by placing orders for shares at prices below the inside (highest) bid to absorb sell orders and create an artificial floor for the stocks;
  • trading in multiple accounts through multiple brokers to give the false impression that there was greater demand for the stocks than truly existed;
  • coordinating trading among a group of individuals for the purpose of maintaining stock prices; and
  • obtaining securities in unlawful, unregistered offerings and then selling the securities to investors and into the markets in similarly unregistered and unlawful transactions

Here are some details on which companies were affected, from the SEC’s legal complaint (pdf):

53. Williams and the Williams Entities participated in the manipulation of the stocks of at least a dozen issuers (Advanced Growing, Axium, Bluefire, Datascension, Interlink, Medirect Latino, National Automation, Packaged Home, Pet Ecology, Remote Surveillance, Riverdale, and Straight Up).
54. Lopez and Da Big Kahuna participated in the manipulation of at least eight stocks (Axium, Bluefire, Interlink, Packaged Home, Pet Ecology, Straight Up, National Automation, and Remote Surveillance).
55.
The defendants used a variety of methods to manipulate the markets for the targeted stocks including, “bid support,” controlling the float, coordinated trading, and trading in multiple accounts.

I find the details of how the alleged manipulation took place to be especially enlightening:

A. Bid Support
56. The defendants and others engaged in what they referred to as “bid support.” This conduct involved layering orders at or near the best bid and ask prices with the intent to stabilize or increase share prices.
57. The defendants placed buy orders for stock at prices immediately below the “inside,” or highest, bid price posted by the market makers. For example, if the highest bid posted by a market maker was $1.50, the defendants might place orders at $1.45, $1.40, and $1.35, often for small amounts of stock.
58. These orders had two purposes. First, the defendants intended to create an artificial floor price for the stock when there was increased selling in the market; the defendants expected that the supporting orders would absorb some of the sell orders so that the stock prices would not fall dramatically. Second, the defendants placed the orders through different brokerage firms so that market participants would see a substantial number of bids and conclude that there was greater demand for the stocks than truly existed.
B. Controlling the Float and Coordinating Trading
59. The overall manipulation strategy relied upon controlling the “float”—the total shares available for investors to trade for a particular stock. As part of the scheme to distribute shares in unregistered offerings, the defendants and others ensured that the majority of shares without restrictive legends were controlled by the group.
60. The defendants and other participants in the scheme controlled the float so that shares would not be “dumped” into the market indiscriminately while they were selling their shares into the market.
61. As described above, the individuals who bought shares from the Williams
Entities had their shares pooled for some initial period (typically 30 to 60 days) and Williams traded their shares during this lock-up period.
62. The defendants and others engaged in coordinated trading to deceive the markets and extract profits from artificially high stock prices. This was accomplished by, among other things, selling in times of increased volume and price and not selling in times of low prices and/or volume.
C. Trading in Multiple Accounts
63. The defendants traded through several different brokerage firms using multiple accounts. This practice gave the impression of market depth to those looking at the market on a “Level II” or “Level III” screen, which identifies the market makers that are originating bids. Additionally, trading spread over many brokerage firms might avoid “red flags” with brokerage houses if large amounts of stock were deposited via stock certificates, thus concealing the fraud.
64. Williams traded stock on behalf of the Williams Entities and in his own name through accounts at multiple brokerage firms. Williams often deposited shares across the numerous accounts to avoid scrutiny and purportedly to ease the “clearing process.”
65. For instance, in the case of Axium, Williams directed the transfer agent to issue stock certificates to TBeck Capital, Victoria Financial, Valek Investments, Warren Street, and himself. An email from another individual to Williams said, “distribute free trading stock to 3 brokerage firms. Remember that the small cert[ificate]s go out first. Don’t send Lampost [Brokerage] any Victoria shares since they think I am on too many accounts.” Valek Investments’ one million Axium shares were issued in twenty certificates of 50,000 shares each. As part of depositing these numerous certificates across all of the accounts, Williams told one of his brokers, “I thought I would deposit one 50,000 share cert[ificate] into each account to make sure y’all are comfortable before I drop the bigger ones in.”
66. Similarly, Lopez traded securities at both his employer and “away” from his employer (in accounts at other firms), and traded in both his own name and in the name of Da Big Kahuna. Lopez made efforts to hide his activities on behalf of Da Big Kahuna from his employer by not properly designating them as “related” accounts. Moreover, the accounts for Da Big Kahuna are listed in the name of one of Lopez’s relatives even though Lopez controlled the trading in those accounts.

Disclosure: No positions in any stocks mentioned. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Trade recap for May 12th

Mentions of AEHI in chat:
[May 12, 2010 12:00:56 PM EDT]     JC      AEHI hod
[May 12, 2010 12:17:32 PM EDT]     JC    AEHI seems pumped hmm
[May 12, 2010 12:22:32 PM EDT]     JC    frigging… AEHI new hod
[May 12, 2010 12:24:59 PM EDT]     SteveS    AEHI how high will that go?!
[May 12, 2010 12:28:03 PM EDT]     Reaper    AEHI omg
[May 12, 2010 12:28:09 PM EDT]     JC    wtf…AEHI..
[May 12, 2010 12:30:28 PM EDT]     Reaper    shorting a bunch of AEHI … very risky
[May 12, 2010 12:30:46 PM EDT]     Reaper    short 3100 AEHI @ .97055

IFLG a nice short (in SogoElite, not shown below):
[May 12, 2010 2:57:57 PM EDT]     Reaper    shorted 1k IFLG @ 5.35 @ sogoelite … very tight 10 cent stop
[May 12, 2010 2:58:50 PM EDT]     Reaper    I like the big offers on IFLG @ 5.37 and 5.40
[May 12, 2010 3:05:59 PM EDT]     Reaper    covered 500 of my IFLG @ 5 still short 500
[May 12, 2010 3:09:42 PM EDT]     Reaper    out IFLG @ 5

My trades today (except those at SogoElite):
BOT    1,000    AMEL    false    Stock    1.3100    USD    SMART    10:26:48        5.00
BOT    1,000    AMEL    false    Stock    1.3100    USD    ARCAEDGE    10:27:22        5.00
SLD    2,000    AEHI    false    Stock    0.9300    USD    SMART    12:27:34        9.30
SLD    100    AEHI    false    Stock    1.3400    USD    SMART    12:28:53        1.00
+    SLD    1,000    AEHI    false    Stock    1.030    USD    SMART    12:30:22        5.00
BOT    1,500    AEHI    false    Stock    0.6000    USD    SMART    12:45:10        4.50
BOT    1,600    AEHI    false    Stock    0.6500    USD    SMART    12:58:53        5.20
+    BOT    5,000    DIVX    false    Stock    7.235    USD    SMART    15:48:17        25.00
+    SLD    2,500    DIVX    false    Stock    7.300    USD    ARCA    15:48:52        12.50
+    SLD    2,500    DIVX    false    Stock    7.400    USD    ISLAND    15:49:12        12.50
+    SLD    500    DIVX    false    Stock    7.510    USD    SMART    15:50:58        2.50
+    BOT    500    DIVX    false    Stock    7.550    USD    SMART    15:54:12        2.50

09:53:31    PRWP    B    0.8    1630    NITE
10:22:18    PRWP    S    0.83    1185    NITE
10:19:11    PRWP    S    0.83    445    NITE

Daily profit: $2,193.60

AEHI Intraday chart
aehi

Disclosure: No positions in any stocks mentioned. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

SEC sues alleged masterminds of Emergent Health (EMGE) pump & dump

See my previous post calling Emergent Health “the next pump.” Tim Sykes also wrote about Emergent Health.

Evidently the SEC agreed with Sykes and myself as they have sued individuals involved in an alleged scheme to pump and dump Emergent Health and another company, Cardiovascular Sciences. Following is the SEC’s litigtation release; see legal complaint (pdf) for more details.

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 21513 / May 4, 2010
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Seven Palm Investments, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-02755 (N.D. Ill.) (May 4, 2010)
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil action today in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Naperville, Illinois based Seven Palm Investments, LLC and its principal Peter P. Veugeler, together with Orlando, Florida based Cardiovascular Sciences, Inc., and Lawrence H. Hooper, Jr. of Oviedo, Florida, for antifraud and registration violations.

According to the SEC’s complaint, from at least October 2007 through September 2009, Veugeler reaped a total of more than $8 million from the pump and dumps of two unrelated companies, Cardiovascular Sciences and Emergent Health Corp. The SEC alleges that Veugeler, through his company Seven Palm, promised financing to both companies in exchange for nearly all their purportedly unrestricted shares. Veugeler, among other things, entered manipulative trades in both companies’ stock, allowing Seven Palm to sell its stock holdings in both companies at artificially inflated prices.

The SEC’s complaint further alleges that Cardiovascular Sciences and Hooper, Cardiovascular Sciences’s president and CEO, disseminated false and misleading press releases and other correspondence to investors between October 2007 and February 2008. The complaint also alleges that Veugeler reviewed and discussed with Hooper a number of the false press releases and directed him to work with a third-party stock promoter to issue the press releases to the public.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Veugeler engaged in manipulative practices aimed at misleading the market to increase and maintain artificially high prices so Veugeler could resell Seven Palm’s Cardiovascular and Emergent holdings for substantial gains.

The SEC’s complaint further alleges that Veugeler devised a Cardiovascular promotional campaign to facilitate Seven Palm’s liquidation of its Cardiovascular shares and that many of the Defendants’ public misrepresentations and omissions concerned Seven Palm providing funding to Cardiovascular. The complaint alleges that public statements regarding Seven Palm providing funding to Cardiovascular were misleading because at the time they were made, Seven Palm had not provided any funding to Cardiovascular.

As alleged in the SEC’s complaint, the defendants violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks a judgment against all defendants providing for injunctions, and civil money penalties. The complaint also seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest against Seven Palm, Veugeler, and Cardiovascular Sciences, and penny stock bars against Veugeler and Hooper.

Here is the stock chart of Emergent Health:
emge

Here is the stock of Cardiovascular Sciences:
cvsc

Disclosure: No positions in any stocks mentioned. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

February pump & dump recap

Here I show the charts of pumps from February and January. See if you notice a pattern. I bought most of these and shorted a few of these. When pump & dumps inevitably dump they drop fast, which is why I always say that buying pumps is very risky. So please, unless you are a trained professional, do not try to buy pumps … the short selling (when shares are available) is far easier.

BGEM – Was a re-pump in February that I bought. The December pump was even better (that is usually the case with re-pumps).

bgem

ECOB – I made $7,000 shorting this in January. I should have held my position longer.

ecob

ISPI – Weak pump. If you buy it you have to sell quick!

ispi

MDCE – Nice pump that Timothy Sykes nailed from the short side on the day it collapsed. I made a bunch on the long side.

mdce

NXTH – I shorted around $3.10 and covered around $2.60. Oops. I still made a couple thousand dollars.

nxth

PEPR – The pump was nice in percentage terms but it never got very high. I still made some money.

pepr

RCYT – Weak pump. I still made some money buying it.

rcyt

WKLI – The latest pump, not bad and I made some money buying it. The dump has only just begun.

wkli

Disclosure: No positions in any stock mentioned. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

The inevitable conclusion to any pump & dump: Charts of CNWI, CRWG, PEPR

CNWI – This pump only lasted a couple days and then had a huge gap down when further pumping failed to materialize.

cnwi

CRWG – A low-volume longer-term pump. Three big down days have eliminated most of its gains.

crwg

PEPR – Pumpers love new OTC listings and ticker changes. Again this only lasted a couple days. Most of the volume appeared ‘fake’ to me, occurring in huge block trades.

pepr

Disclosure: No positions in any stock mentioned. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Trade recap: Short selling NXTH for fun and $2700 in profit

Horrible trading on my part with NXTH but I still did okay. I love penny stock trading! See the video for more. Also check out a special edition of Tim Sykes’ Livestock tonight from 6pm to 7pm EST.

Daily profit: $2677.44

nxth

Intra-day chart:
nxth

Disclosure: No positions in any stock mentioned. This blog has a terms of use and you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well; my full terms of use is incorporated by reference into this post.

Watchlist for February 7th: One shot, one kill

While I wish my title were referring to stock promoters, unfortunately it refers only to my wish for a short on a pumped-up stock.

NXTH – ALFSS. This is very near collapse in my opinion. See Tim Sykes’ post on the pumping behind this stock rise.

nxth

MITI – Nice chart. I will ignore it and look at NXTH though.

miti

Disclosure: No positions in any stock mentioned. This blog has a terms of use and you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well; my full terms of use is incorporated by reference into this post.